下面是范文网小编整理的托福写作如何让事例更有说服力4篇 托福写作如何让事例更有说服力阅读理解，供大家阅读。
托福写作如何让事例更有说服力1
托福独立口语如何让观点更有说服力?这4个表达要点让你能自圆其说
托福独立口语重视观点表达
就某一话题阐述自己的观点是托福口语部分的第一题，也就是独立口语TASK1的考试内容。通常这类话题针对日常生活中发生的事情，考生需要给出自己的看法观点并提供理由。此类题目更多的是考查考生的思维应对能力。那么我们如何在托福口语考试中阐述自己的观点呢?
1. 按照总分结构开门见山
尽量按照总分的结构进行叙述，单刀直入，这也是西方人习惯的表达方式。由一句主题句引出观点与中心，让考官能够清晰地得知叙述的主题，从而打下良好的基础。如果在考题中出现了问题，则应该开门见山地回答问题，切入主题，阐明自己的观点，从而为接下来的详细叙述理清层次以及节约时间，如果有多余的时间，则可以再增添一句总结的话语，使叙述详尽完整。
2. 合理使用逻辑词
在叙述的过程中应该合理地利用逻辑词汇，这样使文章的逻辑顺畅，条理清晰。中国人说话习惯靠上下文去分析句与句的关系，但是西方人不同，他们习惯用逻辑连接词来表达句子关系，如果按照中国人的思维去说英语，在外国人看来就是一堆杂乱无章的句子罗列，这样的分数常常会十分的不好看。论点的叙述，则应该尽量在草稿上简单罗列，讲述时由浅至深，增强逻辑性与条理性。所以，在练习口语的过程中，最好请一位外教跟踪辅导，为学生纠正口音以及语言习惯等问题。
3. 抽象话题具体化
在描述时，应该尽量将抽象的话语具体化，不能很空泛地喊口号做呼吁，这样常常收效甚微。西方人习惯十分具体生动的描述，如描述环境很优美，不应该仅仅说“it's beautiful outside”，而可以去描述flower，tree，bird等细节，增强生动性。
4. 概括问题细节化
面对十分概括的问题时，许多考生会觉得十分难以开口，只能让时间白白流失，痛失了分数。针对这类问题，就应该将问题缩小到一个具体的事物进行叙述和讨论，缩小问题寻找突破口，这种方法也是所有宽泛问题的应对方式。
新托福语法：强调结构的陈述式与疑问式
1. 强调结构的陈述式
强调结构的陈述式为“It is (was) + 被强调部分 + that (who)…”。该结构可用于强调主语、宾语、状语等，但不能强调谓语动词。该句式中用that或who的区别是：当被强调的指人时，用that或who均可;当被强调的不是指人时，则只能用that(注意不用which)。如：It was in the office that he was killed. 他是办公室被杀害的。(强调in the office)
It is the children who broke the window. 是孩子们打破窗户的。(强调the children)
It was to you and not anyone else that I lent the money. 我只借钱给你，不借给其他人。(强调to you and not anyone)
It is only when you have your own children that you realize the troubles of parenthood. 当你有了自己的孩子，才能真切地了解到双亲的辛苦。(强调only when you have your own children)
2. 一般疑问句的强调结构
一般疑问句的强调结构就是将be提到句首，即使用“Is / Was it+ 被强调部分 + that / who…”。如：Is it Tommy who answered the telephone? 是汤米接的电话吗? Is it from advertising that a newspaper earns a lot of its profits? 报纸获利最多的部分是在于广告收入吗?
3. 特殊疑问句的强调结构
特殊疑问句的强调结构句型为“疑问词(Who / What / When / Where / Why / How)+is / was it that…”这样的形式。如：When was it that he got married? 他是什么时候结婚的? How long ago is it that you last saw her? 你上一次看见她是多久以前的事? Who was it that won the World Cup in 1982? 谁赢得了1982年的世界杯? Why is it that I always land up cleaning the bath? 为什么总是该我来洗刷浴缸? In which play of Shakespeare's is it that Viola appears? 维欧拉是在莎士比亚那个剧里出现的吗?
新托福语法：permit后接动词的用法规律
若其后直接跟动词要用动名词
Time doesn't permit my waiting longer. 时间不允许我等得太久。
The rules of the club do not permit smoking. 这个俱乐部规定不准吸烟。
若其后先接宾语再跟动词则要用不定式
His health does not permit him to come. 他的健康(状况)不允许他来。
Her father would not permit her to eat sweets. 她父亲不允许她吃糖果。
比较下面两句
We don't permit smoking in the lecture room. 我们不允许在大教室抽烟。
We don't permit people to smoke in the lecture room. 我们不允许人们在大教室抽烟。
新托福语法：A Lot of / a Lot / Lots
This week's question from Violet is about the phrase 许多。What's the difference between 'a lot of' and 'a lot'?
Yang Li and William Kremer explain that although the basic meaning of both phrases are the same, the grammar and usage are slightly different.
Look at the following dialogue to see how they are used:
Li:Hi Sarah! Do you fancy going for a coffee today? Sarah 想一起喝杯咖啡吗?
Sarah:Oh, I'd love to but I don't really havea lot of time today because I'm going on holiday on Monday and desperately need to pack this afternoon. 想到是想，不过今天我没有多少时间，因为我周一去度假，下午得赶紧准备行李。
Li: No problem! But do you really have a lotto pack? 没关系，不过你有很多东西要打包吗?
Sarah: Yes, lots! I have a young baby and need to take a lot of things with me. 是很多东西!我有个婴儿，需要带很多东西。
Li: Ah, it sounds as though you have a lot on your plate today. Hope the packing goes well. Have a lovely holiday! 听上去你手里的活儿可不少，好好准备，祝你假期愉快。
Sarah: Thank you!谢了。
Notice there is a noun following the phrase 'a lot of'. 只要使用 a lot of, 那么在of的后面一定要跟名词或代词，否则句子不完整。
With 'a lot' and 'lots' you don't need to have a noun or pronoun. 在以上三个句子中 a lot 和 lots 后面不需要名词或代词，因为其本身就是名词，意思是许多东西，许多事情。
We hope that the above examples help give you a better idea of how these phrases are used but as always, our advice is to read as widely as possible to improve your sense of when to use them appropriately.
If you have a question about English, email it to questions.chinaelt@bbc.co.uk. We might answer it on this programme.
Glossary 词汇
usage 用法
Slightly different 稍有不同
desperately 急切地
To pack 打包;准备行装
To have a lot on one's place手里的事太多
托福语法：时间从句中一般过去时与过去完成时
A 由when连接的从句
一个过去的动作紧接另一动作时：
He called her a liar.
他骂她撒谎。
She smacked his face.
她打了他一个耳光。
可以用when把这两个一般过去时的句子连接起来。连接的条件是，从意思上可以明显看出后一动作跟随前一动作，二者并不是同时发生的：
When he called her a liar she smacked his face.
他骂她撒谎时，她打了他一个耳光。
两个过去时这样用时，通常存在这样的概念：第一个动作导致第二个动作，而后者是紧接前者发生的：
When he opened the window the bird flew out.
他一打开窗户鸟就飞出去了。
When the play ended the audience went home.
剧结束后，观众就回家了。
When he died he was given a state funeral.
他去世后，为他举行了国葬。
过去完成时用于when之后，是为了避免使用两个一般过去时可能给人造成两个动作同时发生的印象：
When he had shut the window we opened the door of the cage.
他关了窗户之后，我们把笼门打开了。(我们等他关紧了窗户才打开笼门。)
When she had sung her song she sat down.
她唱完歌之后坐了下来。(如写成 When she sang her song she satdown，可能造成她是坐着唱歌的印象。)
When he had seen all the pictures he said he was ready to leave.
他看了所有的画之后说他要走了。(在他看完画之后……)试和下句相比较：
When he saw all the pictures he expressed amazement that one manshould have painted so many.
他看见所有的画时，表示十分惊奇，一个人竟然画了这么多画。(他一看见画就这么说。)
过去完成时同样可以与as soon as，the moment，immediately连用。(关于as作为表示时间的连词的用法，参见第332节。)
B 过去完成时可以与till/until和before连用，强调一个动作结束或预期将结束，但要注意在till/until+过去完成时+一般过去时结构中，表示一般过去时的动作可以位于表示过去完成时的动作之前，而在before+过去完成时+一般过去时结构中表示一般过去时的动作总是位于表示过去完成时的动作之前：
He refused to go till he had seen all the pictures.
他在看完所有的画之后才同意走。
He did not wait till we had finished our meal.
他没等到我们吃完饭就走了。
Before we had finished our meal he ordered us back to work.
没等我们吃完饭，他就命令我们回去干活。
Before we had walked ten miles he complained of sore feet.
我们还没走出十英里路，他就抱怨脚痛了。
也可以在表示时间的从句中和主句中都用过去完成时：
It was a very expensive town.Before we had been here a week we hadspent all our money.
那是一个物价很贵的地方。我们到这儿还不到一星期，就花光了所有的钱。
C 在after之后一般用过去完成时态：
After the will had been read there were angry exclamations.
遗嘱宣读完之后，激起了一片愤怒的?时刻回顾更为过去的动作时，要用过去完成时。如果有两个这样的动作：He had beento school but he had learnt nothing there，so was now illiterate(他上过学但什么也没学到，因此现在还是个文盲)，而又想用时间连词把它们连接起来，就可以用when等连词连接两个过去完成时：
When he had been at school he had learnt nothing，so he was now illiter-ate.
他上学的时候什么也没学到，所以现在还是个文盲。
但更常见的情况是，这里时间从句中的动词用一般过去时：
When he was at school he had learnt nothing，
(译文同上。)
类似的例句还有：
He had stayed in his father’s firm till his father died.Then he had startedhis own business and was now a very successful man.
他在父亲的公司里一直呆到父亲去世。之后他便自己开业，其时已成为一个事业有成的商人。
E 表示认识、理解等的动词一般在时间从句中不用过去完成时，除非有时间修饰：
When she had known me for a year she invited me to tea.
她认识了我一年之后，邀请我吃茶点。
When I knew the work of one department thoroughly I was moved to thenext department.
在我完全熟悉了一个部门的工作之后，又被调到另一部门。相当于：
As soon as I knew…
试与下句比较：
When I had learnt the work of one department I was moved.
我学会一个部门的工作之后，就被调走了。
托福写作如何让事例更有说服力2
在写作简历时，要时刻记住你是在一个商业环境中推销自己，尽量使用适合这种环境的语言，尤其是在对你的工作业绩和成就进行说明的时候，那么，什么样的语言是商业语言呢？简单的说，就是定量化的语言，你的简历中具体的数字越多，你的商业价值就传达得越明确，尽可能使用量化的语言描述你的技能、工作职责和工作成绩，数字会大大增强简历的可读性。
具体地说，用数据或百分比指标来量化你的业绩和技能，如多少数量、多少次、占多少百分比等等，你的表述越具体，未来的雇主就容易判断出你是否适合去他或她的公司工作。例如：
1) 列举一项或多项你参加或承担的重要项目或计划，你在其中的职责和贡献（哪怕你在其中只是作为服务支持或行政管理人员），在达到或完成规定的工作任务之外，你还作出了那些其他贡献；
2) 你是否有什么建议曾被上司、部门或是公司采纳？若有，说明其内容、在实施这些建议时你的作用以及你因此取得的业绩和资你的作用以及你因此取得的业绩和资历；
3) 你是否管理别人工作？若有，有多少人在你的领导之下？他们是哪种层次的员工（文秘类、技术类、业务类、行政管理类等）？
4) 你是否处理过紧急或危险情况？并对此加以说明；
5) 你培训过员工吗？若有，说明有关的方法、程序或内容，说明这种工作是你主动自愿还是上级的要求；
6) 你做过那些给你带来满足感，或者得到上级、管理层或客户表扬和认可的工作；
7) 你有哪些突出的贡献为公司增加了利润和收益、节约了费用和时间、扩大了客户群、降低了员工流失率、提高了生产率、改进了产品质量、增加了公司知名度、削减了库存、建立及改进了工作流程，并用具体数字加以说明，例如：你的销售额是否每个月都超过定额的50%？你是否有建立或改进新的工作流程而每年节省公司费用十万元？你是否为一个新产品开拓了规模为一千万元的新市场？
托福写作如何让事例更有说服力3
GRE写作怎么论证更有说服力?这8大论证方法不可不知
GRE写作论证方法：演绎推理论证法
将一个具体的事例运用到一个一般性原则从而得出结论。
论点：demand for this product wii go up。
论据：The price of the product is sliding.
推理依据：Whenever prices of a product go down , demand for it rises.
(说明：由论据“the price of the product is sliding ”推出论点“Demand for this product will go up”,这个过程是否有效取决于推理依据“whenever prices of a product go down , demand for it rises”是否成立。下面每一种论证方法都是如此)
GRE写作论证方法：定义法
界定一个概念的关键内涵;或者认定某个事物符合某个定义，从而得出结论。例如：
论点：Radical feminists are not good citizens.
论据：Radical feminists lack family values.
推理依据：Family values characterize the good citizes.
GRE写作论证方法：因果关系论证法
将一个判断放入一个因果关系中，指出它或者是原因，或者是结果。例如：
论点：The internet may be causing depression.
论据：When a group of people increased their use of the Internet , they felt depressed.
推理依据：There are no other reasons for the group's depression.
GRE写作论证方法：归纳推理论证法
从若干个具体事例中推出共性的一般结论。如：
论点：Everyone likes the movie.
论据：I know three people who like the movie.
推理依据：Three eaxmples are enough.
GRE写作论证方法：列举特征式论证法
指出某事物发生或者生存的征候或者迹象。例如：
论点：The child has chickenpox.
论据：The child has red spots.
推理依据：These spots are signs of chickenpox.
GRE写作论证方法：类比论证法
用我们已知的、熟悉的事物同未知的。不熟悉的事物加以比较，并用前者的情况解释者 的情况。分为三种：纵向类比(过去的事物同现在的、同一类事物的类比)、横向类比(同一 时期、同一事物之间的类比)、比喻式类比(不同类别事物之间的类比)。例如：
1.纵向类比(Historical analogy)
论点：Many people will die of SARS.
论据：Many people died of the Black Death.
推理依据：SARS and Black Death are similar.
2.横向类比(Literal analogy)
论点：China should have its fighter carriers.
论据：A neighboring country has a powerful carrier fleet.
推理依据：The two countries are similar enough to draw such a comparison.
3.比喻式类比(Metaphorical analogy)
论点：Reading a difficult book should take time.
论据：Digesting a large metal takes time.
推理依据：Reading and eating are sufficiently alike to be compared.
GRE写作论证方法：引用权威论证法
引用公认的权威，或者论证自己就是权威从而对自己的观点加以论证。例如：
论点：China's economy will grow 8 poercent this year.
论据：Professors and scientists say so.
推理依据：These experts are reliable.
GRE写作论证方法：诉诸尝试法
利用人们的常识【包括：普遍的价值观念、人的普遍动机、生活常识】进行论证。例如：
1.诉诸普遍性的价值观念。
论点：The university curriculum should be multicultural.
论据：A multicultural curriculum will contribute to equality and acceptance.
推理依据：You value equality and acceptance.
只是一个详细的结构上的分析说明，在具体运用时，我们经常讲推理依据和论据放在了一起，但只要合理即可。论据可以自己编造，也可以是大众的例子，关键在于自己怎么样建立论点和论据之间的桥梁。上面的这些技巧，可能我们只用到某种或某几种，但我们必须得会至少一种。
GRE Issue写作优秀实例：实用的意义
题目：
Practicality is now our great idol, which all powers and talents must serve.Anything that is not obviously practical has little value in today's world.
正文：
In today’s society idealism seems to become an ideology that is marginalized and practicality is our great idol, thus, the speaker asserts that anything that is not practical bears little value. I admit that being practical is the wide-accepted dogma in order to survive in this world, but by going too far to claim that anything that is not practical has little value is against the empirical observation as well as the general stimulus that push the human society forward.
Admittedly, practicality has become a cult in today’s society. Too often do we hear people talk about being practical whenever they come to make important decisions or choose between several alternatives. The deep-rooted cause underlying this phenomenon is that with the development of modern society, the emphasis is placed more on financial gaining, quick fame, sensible choice and so forth. Our society is rather stable compared with that of the last century when war, violence, human right movements has become the symbol of that period. People are enjoying this peaceful environment with less crucial missions rested upon them and as a result, they shift from idealism to struggle for the common well being of mankind to the practical concept of individual achievement.
This ideology has its merits since after all the disaster and upheaval that our human race has undergone, it is judicious to focus on the economic aspect of things in order to tackle the most important social problems such as poverty, hunger and environmental problems which all deserve us to sit down and work out practical solutions. On the personal level, being practical is how a person would possibly succeed in his career or personal life. One is likely to make sensible decisions for his education and job choice on the basis of practical consideration of his own strength and weakness and careful analysis of the prospect of research direction and job market. Even those in power and intellects need to consider practically since hasty decision built upon pure ideal meditation would hardly find its way in the modern society and is doom to failure.
Agreeing with the speaker that practicality has become the great idol in our society, I am strongly against his point that anything that is not practical has little value. Even in today’s society, idealism is by no means relegated to the place of total neglect and disregard. For one thing, in history, so much achievement is the outcome of several generations’ struggle such as fighting for equality for women, human rights movement,etc. In today’s society, practicality is the way we can obtain our goal but idealism offers the philosophical explanation of why we should set this as our goal and the clear the ultimate value of our pursuing. What is more, by totally fixed one's eyes upon the practical aspect of things, we face the danger of neglecting one important part of our pursuit, that is the mental enjoyment brought out by idealism. If we have a clear goal set in mind and put practical endeavor at the same time, the result would be more satisfactory and valuable.
To sum up, I agree with the speaker insofar as the wide acceptance of practicality is considered. Being practical is the tenet of modern society and it does shed light on the wise way of doing things and obtaining goals, no matter in the personal or social level.But the speaker goes too far by claiming that it is the only valuable ideology in society.I am strongly against this idea since in history or at present, we human beings still need the philosophical explanation to clear our goal and to provide motivation. In this aspect, idealism would never be replaced with pure practical consideration. Otherwise,human society will be replete with insensible people directed by economic profit and quick fame and recognition.
GRE作文优秀范例
“The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.”
Sample Essay
The intensity of today’s media coverage has been greatly magnified by the sheer number and types of media outlets that are available today. Intense competition for the most revealing photographs and the latest information on a subject has turned even minor media events into so-called “media frenzies”. Reporters are forced by the nature of the competition to pry ever deeper for an angle on a story that no one else has been able to uncover. With this type of media coverage, it does become more and more likely that anyone who is subjected to it will have his or her reputation tarnished, as no individual is perfect. Everyone makes mistakes. The advances in technology have made much information easily and instantaneously available. Technology has also made it easier to dig further than ever before into a person’s past, increasing the possibility that the subject’s reputation may be harmed.
The above statement is much too broad, however. “Anyone” covers all people all over the world. There are people whose reputations have only been enhanced by media scrutiny. There are also people whose reputations were already so poor that media scrutiny could not possibly diminish it any further. There may very well be people that have done nothing wrong in the past, at least that can be discovered by the media, whose reputations could not be diminished by media scrutiny. To broadly state that “anyone” subjected to media coverage will have his or her status sullied implies that everyone’s reputation worldwide is susceptible to damage under any type of media scrutiny. What about children, particularly newborn children? What about those people whose past is entirely unknown?
Another problem with such a broad statement is that it does not define the particular level of media scrutiny. Certainly there are different levels of media coverage. Does merely the mention of one’s name in a newspaper constitute media scrutiny? What about the coverage of a single event in someone’s life, for example a wedding or the birth of a baby? Is the media coverage of the heroic death of a firefighter or police officer in the line of duty ever going to diminish that person’s reputation? It seems highly unlikely that in these examples, although these people may have been subjected to media scrutiny, these individual’s reputations are undamaged and potentially enhanced by such exposure.
Without a doubt, there are many examples of individual’s whose reputations have been diminished by media scrutiny. The media’s uncovering of former U.S. President Bill Clinton’s affair with Monica Lewinsky will most likely overshadow the entire eight years of his administration. Basketball superstar Michael Jordan’s sterling reputation has been tarnished more than once by the media; first by media coverage of his gambling habits, then most recently (and in a much more harmful manner) by news reports of his marital infidelities and the divorce from his wife of thirteen years. Fame and fortune can turn an ordinary individual into a media target where reporters will stop at almost nothing to “dig up dirt” that will sell more newspapers or entice more viewers to watch a television program. It could even be argued that media scrutiny killed Princess Diana as her car sped away from the privacy-invading cameras of reporters in Paris. There is no doubt that there are a large number of people who have been hurt in one way or another by particularly intense media scrutiny.
In summary, it seems impossible that for every person that is subjected to media scrutiny, his or her reputation will eventually be diminished. Millions of people are mentioned in the media every day yet still manage to go about their lives unhurt by the media. Normal individuals that are subjected to media scrutiny can have their reputation either enhanced or damaged depending on the circumstances surrounding the media coverage. The likelihood of a diminished reputation from the media rises proportionally with the level of notoriety that an individual possesses and the outrageousness of that person’s behavior. The length of time in the spotlight can also be a determining factor, as the longer the person is examined in the media, the greater the possibility that damaging information will be discovered or that the individual will do something to disparage his or her reputation. But to broadly state that media scrutiny will diminish anyone’s reputation is to overstate the distinct possibility that, given a long enough time and a certain level of intensity of coverage, the media may damage a person’s reputation.
托福写作如何让事例更有说服力4
说服力是一项必要而强有力的技能，我相信任何人都能成为一个有说服力、有魅力、令人信服的人。
无论你是想要寻求商业伙伴，投资人，还是关系良好的代理人，说话有说服力是一项必要而强有力的技能。这种技能，是成功的企业家应该掌握的一项能无限发挥作用的技能。
但是要想有说服力并不简单，而且也并不是虚幻的。我不是专家，但我相信任何人都能成为一个有说服力、有魅力、令人信服的人。我也相信要想有说服力与耍阴谋诡计无关。我相信没有这些诡计，可能更能有说服力。
以下有些方法，能够帮助你成为一个更有说服力的人：
1. 自信。 如果你想让别人听你说的，那么首先你要相信自己。在走路、谈话、穿衣方面展现自信–这会让你产生变化!
2. 真诚。有说服力并不意味着欺骗别人–而是告诉别人你很真诚。不要像那些欺骗人的二手车销售人员一样，隐藏事实;要做诚实的生意人，提供大量的产品。
3. 直接。如果你有重要的事情，直接说出来。饶圈子会让你看起来犹豫。但是要说到点上，那样你看起来就会是坚定，有威信和聪慧的。
4. 简单。把那些复杂高深的词汇留给英文教授。无论是说还是写，简单易懂的语言能够帮助你和观众互动。(还能够使你的话听起来避免过于浮夸)如果你有麻烦的话，那么你就想像你是在和好朋友说话(或写信)。
5. 谦逊。没有一个人喜欢炫耀的人，但是虚伪的谦虚则更讨人厌。对于自己的成就感到骄傲是好的，但是应该把那些天花乱坠的感受留在家里。
6. 客观。退一步，客观地审视你的理由(或者销售状况)。你能够确保你指定的每个点都客观公正么?如果不能，你可能要考虑改变你的观点。
7. 专业。你曾有过和知晓一切与所谈话题有关的专家谈话的经历么?知识是有说服力的。无论你是演讲还是销售，做个专家型的人吧。确保你自己知道你谈论的一切。搜寻到的'信息，应该比你想到的多，这点很重要，这点会显现出来的。
8. 有责任感。无论你有多有说服力，也一定会有异议出现，
资料
如果你负有责任感并且尊重反对意见的话，你会看起来更真诚。记住，你是在进行会谈交流–聆听也是很重要的。
9. 直率。外表华丽能让你在第一印象中看起来怡人，但在长时间的接触中，他同样会让你显得不那么可信。换句话说，当你特别诚信时，甚至你的对手都会尊重你。换言之，要机智，但是别怕发表你真实的意见。
10. 富有热情。热情是会感染人的。如果某件事儿让你特别兴奋，无论它是件产品、是个主意还是个机会，你都要确保你的观众能有同样的感受。记住，如何去说和你要说什么是一样重要的。热情能让你与众不同。
11. 富有思想。通过告诉他们你经过认真思考后的想法，向你的观周表达你的观点，你认为他们的意见很有价值。如果你有胡子，缕缕胡子。不要草率行事;和马虎犯错相比，多花点时间好得多。
12. 透明。如果你看上去像是隐瞒着什么的话，人们会很自然怀疑你。所以尽量在观众面前透明化。分享一些个人细节-甚至是那些让你有点尴尬的细节-这是和人联系的好方法。你的观众更多的“了解”你，他们就会更加信任你。
13. 保留些惊喜。不同寻常的解决方式，怪异的观点，甚至是个革命性的产品，都会让观众惊喜。这样不仅能抓住他们的注意力，也能使气氛活跃!
14. 理解别人。客户需要被理解。花功夫聆听和理解他们所关心的问题是很重要的。不要忽略任何事儿–即便你认为这很愚蠢。记住，那是你的客户真正关心的事儿。
15. 大胆。从小，我们就被告知应该遵循领导的意见。可是如果你想要由说服力，那么就从把自己放在领导位置开始。做别人不敢做的事儿，说别人不敢说得话，那么你就会成为被别人追随的大胆的领导。
16. 有雄心壮志。人们都希望受到鼓舞，所以不要限制自己，低估自己。如果你有雄心壮志，就跟你的观众一起分享。告诉他们你的目标，他们自然会与你相随。
17. 乐观。提供给别人比我们拥有的更好的东西。可以是个新产品、一个新的商业机会、或者是更开心的生活。外表阳光–这是能让人们对于未来有兴趣的方法。
是什么让人成为有说服力的人呢?你的生活中，你认为谁有说服力?为什么?你如何能让自己更有说服力?分享些你的技巧。